Virginia Fails to Protect its Citizens from Medical Negligence

Christopher Nace
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 660
Visit Christopher Nace on LinkedIn
Posted by Christopher NaceMarch 10, 2009 9:28 AM
Tags: None

A recent story in the Virginia-Pilot details the corner that Virginia health care consumers have been painted in:

A decade after a legislative panel found that Virginia allowed dangerous doctors to keep practicing for years before losing their licenses, a national study says the state remains among those least likely to take serious disciplinary action against physicians.

According to a study by Public Citizen Virginia is one of the least likely states to discipline physicians for errors.

The issue has been thrust back into the spotlight by the case of a Virginia Beach doctor accused of contributing to the deaths of a series of patients during the past five years.

The Virginian-Pilot has documented that 10 patients of Dr. Stephen Plotnick have died since 2004, according to medical board records, civil lawsuits and medical examiners' reports. At least seven of those were overdose deaths directly traceable to drugs Plotnick prescribed.

What is particularly troubling is that Virginia is a state with one of the most draconian tort reform statutes, limiting recovery in medical malpractice actions to a total of approximately $2 million. That includes everything from pain and suffering to lost wages to future medical bills. A child that is born with serious brain injuries as the result of medical negligence will incur health care costs into the tens of millions of dollars over the course of a lifetime, but in Virginia, even in the most egregious cases of medical negligence the family could only recover $2 million.

Now we learn through the Public Citizen study that the Commonwealth is one of the most lax at disciplining physicians who make errors. If the government won't protect it's citizens and private suits through the courts don't act as a true deterrent, what incentive is there for physicians to come to work each day and practice medicine at the highest level?

This exemplifies why if the government won't do its job and regulate certain industries and professions there needs to be a strong civil justice system. Unfortunately for the citizens of Virginia, that state has decided that health care providers will not be held responsible in either venue.

3 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Steve LombardiInjuryBoard Attorney Member
Posted by Steve Lombardi
March 10, 2009 1:09 PM

Chris: Excellent post about a subject much understood by the working men and women of this country. They don't appreciate the issue until it's them on the receiving end of a bad result. As patients they need to keep their fingers crossed and pray there is never the need to see you about a medical malpractice event. I've posted about Hawaii and Texas also with tort reform measures that pass on to the patient the need to insure risks associated with poor medical care. Like those states the message in Virginia is clear - if you need surgery or hospitalization go to some other state to obtain medical treatment. Have it done in a state that makes it's health care system be responsible for it's mistakes. Because in Virginia the state policy is obviously welcoming doctors with poor medical judgement and lousy surgical skills and then to pass on the insuring of those mistakes to the patient. For more reading on the IB go to: 1. Stepping on the Little Guy: Hawaii, like Texas is moving towards socializing medicine; or 2. Stepping on the Little Guy: Dallas worker loses all four limbs, is awarded $17.7 million; well, almost, but not quite. ; and 3. Texas Tort Reform Message – Go west young man; go east or north, but go.
Again, well written and a very timely post.

Steve LombardiInjuryBoard Attorney Member
Posted by Steve Lombardi
March 10, 2009 1:57 PM

Sorry I meant "much misunderstood".

Just Another Guy
Posted by Just Another Guy
March 21, 2009 5:06 PM

Mr. Lombardi, you must be a trial attorney who stands to gain much off of multimillion dollar awards.

I would have no problem with paying out a multimillion dollar settlement to a family if I made a mistake, on one condition....they get to keep the vast majority of it and not have to fork over 30% to you.

If I'm paid a flat fee to remove an appendix, then you should be paid a flat fee to try a case. Agree?

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Washington

InjuryBoard Washington RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Washington is brought to you by Paulson & Nace

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Paulson & Nace (866) 735-1102 Ext 660 www.paulsonandnace.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Serving Washington, DC and all surrounding areas including Montgomery County, Maryland; Prince George's County, Maryland; Anne Arundel County, Maryland; Berkeley County, West Virginia; Jefferson County, West Virginia; and Northern Virginia.
1615 New Hampshire Avenue, NW, Washington, District of Columbia 20009-2520 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address